linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: split up spi_new_device() to allow two stage registration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 May 2008 00:43:58 -0600
From:	"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	"David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fabrizio.garetto@...il.com,
	jonsmirl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: split up spi_new_device() to allow two stage registration.

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:17 PM, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> On Friday 16 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> This patch splits the allocation and registration portions of code out
>> of spi_new_device() and creates three new functions; spi_alloc_device(),
>> spi_register_device(), and spi_device_release().
>
> I have no problem with the first two, but why the last?
>
> If the devices are always allocated by spi_alloc_device() as
> they should be -- probably through an intermediary -- the
> only public function necessary for that cleanup should be
> the existing spi_dev_put().

Ah, okay.  I'm still a bit fuzzy on the device model conventions.
I'll remove that then.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/