[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211728189.5913.71.camel@andromache>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 00:39:49 +0930
From: Glen Turner <gdt@....id.au>
To: Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of
IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 21:55 -0700, Chris Peterson wrote:
> * network drivers could use IRQF_SAMPLE_URANDOM
Is it permissable for /dev/urandom to degrade to be externally
influenced
by a hostile party?
For example, /dev/random has run out. So the output of /dev/urandom is
now
determined by previous values of /dev/random. I then send in a stack of
network packets at regular intervals. So the output of /dev/urandom is
now greatly determined by those packets. My search space for the
resulting
key is small since /dev/urandom appears to be random, but in fact is
periodic.
I'll also note that there is a huge number of periodic packets seen by
hosts on quiet networks -- such as a preparation VLAN where a system
administrator might choose to run up a new machine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists