[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211729202.5913.81.camel@andromache>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 00:56:42 +0930
From: Glen Turner <gdt@....id.au>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, tpm@...horst.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last
few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 19:53 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I never quite understood the rationale behind that one either:
> if you worry about someone else controlling the timing of these events,
> why do you not worry about timings on the local system. e.g.
> it's not that hard to predict with similar accuracy when a hard disk
> interrupt happened when a local process read something from disk. Or
> when the keyboard/USB interrupt happened when you process keyboard input.
Accepting packets requires you to trust another party -- the network
provider and users of your host's networked services -- which you do
not have to trust otherwise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists