[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805250748.38163.mitov@issp.bas.bg>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 07:48:38 +0300
From: Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_{ADDR,LEN} question
Hi all,
In Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt is written:
NOTE: DO NOT put a semicolon at the end of the
DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_{ADDR,LEN}() macro.
While the output of
grep DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ drivers/net/*
contains lines with and without semicolon:
drivers/net/acenic.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping)
drivers/net/acenic.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping)
drivers/net/acenic.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_LEN(maplen)
drivers/net/bnx2.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping)
drivers/net/bnx2.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping)
drivers/net/bnx2x.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping)
drivers/net/qla3xxx.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapaddr);
drivers/net/qla3xxx.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_LEN(maplen);
drivers/net/qla3xxx.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapaddr);
drivers/net/qla3xxx.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_LEN(maplen);
drivers/net/skge.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapaddr);
drivers/net/skge.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_LEN(maplen);
drivers/net/sky2.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapaddr);
drivers/net/sky2.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(maplen);
drivers/net/sky2.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(data_size);
drivers/net/tg3.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping)
drivers/net/tg3.h: DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR(mapping)
My question is:
Why one should NOT put semicolon at the end of the macro?
If it is _really_ important, should it be removed/patched?
Thank you for your answers.
Regards
Marin Mitov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists