[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211807312.4843.2.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 15:08:32 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@...l.com>,
kay.sievers@...y.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: Add CONFIG_BUILTIN_FIRMWARE option
> This doesn't make any sense. Either it is a filename/pathname, or it is not.
I still think that in the kernel it shouldn't be thought of as a
filename and I have not yet seen any real reason why it has to be.
Whether your userspace then uses it as a filename or not is pretty much
orthogonal, it currently does for great effect, and since the only
firmware loader currently is userspace, we tend to think of it as a
filename in the kernel too.
However, when building firmware into the kernel, this will no longer be
true, it'll be a simple key in an array.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists