[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <orprr9uh53.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 14:09:12 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@...l.com>,
kay.sievers@...y.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: Add CONFIG_BUILTIN_FIRMWARE option
On May 26, 2008, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de> wrote:
> On Monday 26 May 2008 05:13:18 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On May 25, 2008, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de> wrote:
>>
>> > One additional thing is to make sure the usability of the whole stuff
>> > is not reduded.
>>
>> Removing support for slashes wouldn't reduce usability. It would be
>> no more than silly policy (and ego?) enforcement.
> I the other mail you say that the string is _not_ a filename.
I do, and I stand by that claim, that is not backed by documentation,
but rather by peeking at the implementation.
> So why do we want to remove the slash from the allowed charset, if
> the string is not a filename?
Exactly my point. I don't know any reason to do that. It appears to
be just silly policy (and ego) enforcement.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists