[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080528160413.GA6910@cvg>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:04:13 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 06/11] x86: nmi_32/64.c - use apic_write_around instead
of apic_write
[Maciej W. Rozycki - Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:35:14PM +0100]
| On Sat, 24 May 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
|
| > apic_write_around will be expanded to apic_write in 64bit mode
| > anyway. Only a few CPUs (well, old CPUs to be precise) requires
| > such an action. In general it should not hurt and could be cleaned
| > up for apic_write (just in case)
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
| > ---
|
| Acked-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org>
|
| Almost all local APIC write accesses must use apic_write_around(). The
| notable exceptions are appropriately guarded accesses to the ESR (there is
| no need ever to write to this register on Pentium processors and a read of
| the register has side-effects) and pieces of code known never to run on
| original Pentium processors.
|
| Maciej
|
Thanks Maciej!
Could you take a look please on
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/26/146
i'm investigateting what is happening (Adrian pointed on
main reason I think) but can't understand why is that.
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists