| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:26:25 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br> To: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2) On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > This version better documents *_RFKILL_ALL. Is it good enough for an > > ACK for patch 14 of 15? > > Yes, you can put my ack on patch 14. > Thanks for the documentation update. :) Then, this entire batch is ready for merging. Now, if only Len would come back from wherever he disappeared to, in order to merge the two thinkpad-acpi patches, I could send it to netdev for merge. I will at least publish the entire stack as a thinkpad-acpi pre-release version, to get some testing on the real world with some power users. I am thinking about how to best handle the global states. Doing it through the rfkill class is ready, but the result was *UGLY*. More on this later. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists