[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805291919.04384.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:19:04 +0200
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2)
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > > This version better documents *_RFKILL_ALL. Is it good enough for an
> > > ACK for patch 14 of 15?
> >
> > Yes, you can put my ack on patch 14.
> > Thanks for the documentation update. :)
>
> Then, this entire batch is ready for merging. Now, if only Len would
> come back from wherever he disappeared to, in order to merge the two
> thinkpad-acpi patches, I could send it to netdev for merge.
Actually, I believe the correct merge order would through wireless-dev,
which means the patches should go to John Linville and linux-wireless in the CC.
> I will at least publish the entire stack as a thinkpad-acpi pre-release
> version, to get some testing on the real world with some power users.
>
> I am thinking about how to best handle the global states. Doing it
> through the rfkill class is ready, but the result was *UGLY*. More on
> this later.
Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists