| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:19:04 +0200 From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com> To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2) On Thursday 29 May 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > This version better documents *_RFKILL_ALL. Is it good enough for an > > > ACK for patch 14 of 15? > > > > Yes, you can put my ack on patch 14. > > Thanks for the documentation update. :) > > Then, this entire batch is ready for merging. Now, if only Len would > come back from wherever he disappeared to, in order to merge the two > thinkpad-acpi patches, I could send it to netdev for merge. Actually, I believe the correct merge order would through wireless-dev, which means the patches should go to John Linville and linux-wireless in the CC. > I will at least publish the entire stack as a thinkpad-acpi pre-release > version, to get some testing on the real world with some power users. > > I am thinking about how to best handle the global states. Doing it > through the rfkill class is ready, but the result was *UGLY*. More on > this later. Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists