linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080528223353.61affb22.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2008 22:33:53 -0500
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	miaox@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and
 mems_allowed after CPU/NODE offline/online

Miao wrote:
> Though the patch is a little big, most of the change is just code restruction.

This looks like a nice bug fix - thanks!

Allow me to ask a question, but I hope you will be happy to answer yes
or no, either way, as you see it.

The question is:

  Would it be easy to split this patch into two pieces, where:
  1) the first piece contains the restructuring (but is still buggy), and
  2) the second piece has just the bug fix?

If that would be easy, that might make a nice way to present this fix.

If that would not be so easy, that's ok ... I can still review easily
enough.  I'll just have to drink an extra cup of coffee first, to make
my mind a little more alert <grin>.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/