linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <483E25D4.6090809@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 11:41:08 +0800
From:	Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed
 after CPU/NODE offline/online

on 2008-5-29 11:33 Paul Jackson wrote:
> Miao wrote:
>> Though the patch is a little big, most of the change is just code restruction.
> 
> This looks like a nice bug fix - thanks!
> 
> Allow me to ask a question, but I hope you will be happy to answer yes
> or no, either way, as you see it.
> 
> The question is:
> 
>   Would it be easy to split this patch into two pieces, where:
>   1) the first piece contains the restructuring (but is still buggy), and
>   2) the second piece has just the bug fix?
> 

ok, I will do it.

Miao Xie

> If that would be easy, that might make a nice way to present this fix.
> 
> If that would not be so easy, that's ok ... I can still review easily
> enough.  I'll just have to drink an extra cup of coffee first, to make
> my mind a little more alert <grin>.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/