linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched domains (ie remove cpu_isolated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <483F8178.7040300@qualcomm.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 21:24:24 -0700
From:	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched domains
 (ie remove cpu_isolated_map)



Paul Jackson wrote:
> Max wrote:
>> btw I suppose you missed my reply.
> 
> I did not see your reply.  Did you send it to me or lkml?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121207910616332&w=2

>> Also Ingo at some point accepted a patch from Peter
>> that partially removed the isolated map.
> 
> Reference?  Did it remove the boot parameter isolcpus= ?
Yes it removed boot param. I cannot seem to come up with the right search
string. And the sched-devel git tree is gone.

> My concern is removing user visible features, without
> good reason and careful consideration and some planning.
I understand. How would you plan for this ?
----


Did you get a chance to look at patch that addresses hotplug/domain issues ?

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/