linux-kernel - Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805311431100.2329@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Sat, 31 May 2008 14:46:21 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Subject: Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+

On Sat, 31 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> 
> > ah, in retrospect i realized that this test had one flaw: some of the 
> > systems i the build cluster already ran a newer kernel and hence were 
> > targets for this bug.
> > 
> > so i turned off CONFIG_TCP_CONG_CUBIC on all the testboxes and 
> > rebooted the cluster boxes into 2.6.25, and the hung sockets are now 
> > gone. (about 150 successful iterations)
> > 
> > i did another change as well: i removed the localhost distcc 
> > component. I'll reinstate that now to make sure it's really related to 
> > TCP_CONG_CUBIC and not to localhost networking.
> 
> ok, once i added back the localhost distcc component and the hung kernel 
> build + stuck TCP socket bug happened again overnight:
> 
>  Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
>  Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address               Foreign Address             State
>  tcp    72187      0 10.0.1.14:3632              10.0.1.14:47910             ESTABLISHED
>  tcp        0 174464 10.0.1.14:47910             10.0.1.14:3632              ESTABLISHED
> 
> so it seems distcc over localhost was the aspect that made it fail.
> 
> _Perhaps_ what matters is to have the new post-rc3 TCP code on _both_ 
> sides of the connection. But that is just a theory - it could be timing, 
> etc.

Btw, does your distcc perhaps happen enable TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT (there were
some post 2.6.25 changes into it)?

-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/