[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080531060947.GA26441@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:09:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Ilpo J?rvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> ah, in retrospect i realized that this test had one flaw: some of the
> systems i the build cluster already ran a newer kernel and hence were
> targets for this bug.
>
> so i turned off CONFIG_TCP_CONG_CUBIC on all the testboxes and
> rebooted the cluster boxes into 2.6.25, and the hung sockets are now
> gone. (about 150 successful iterations)
>
> i did another change as well: i removed the localhost distcc
> component. I'll reinstate that now to make sure it's really related to
> TCP_CONG_CUBIC and not to localhost networking.
ok, once i added back the localhost distcc component and the hung kernel
build + stuck TCP socket bug happened again overnight:
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 72187 0 10.0.1.14:3632 10.0.1.14:47910 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 174464 10.0.1.14:47910 10.0.1.14:3632 ESTABLISHED
so it seems distcc over localhost was the aspect that made it fail.
_Perhaps_ what matters is to have the new post-rc3 TCP code on _both_
sides of the connection. But that is just a theory - it could be timing,
etc.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists