[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080601153512.GA8159@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 21:05:12 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 06/12] split LRU lists into anon & file sets
* Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> [2008-05-29 16:22:52]:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>
> Split the LRU lists in two, one set for pages that are backed by
> real file systems ("file") and one for pages that are backed by
> memory and swap ("anon"). The latter includes tmpfs.
>
> Eventually mlocked pages will be taken off the LRUs alltogether.
> A patch for that already exists and just needs to be integrated
> into this series.
>
> This patch mostly has the infrastructure and a basic policy to
> balance how much we scan the anon lists and how much we scan
> the file lists. The big policy changes are in separate patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
>
Hi, Rik,
My problems with OOM continue, despite the changes incorporated into
memcontrol.c. While I am investigating the problem, the code below
seemed incorrect.
> +static inline void
> +del_page_from_active_file_list(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
> +{
> + del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
> }
Shouldn't this be del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE)?
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists