[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4843D71A.5090107@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:18:50 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Rami Rosen <ramirose@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] [NETFILTER] Misc Cleanups.
Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
> - Thanks for your comments; I was not aware that this issues occur
> in other places too; attached here is another patch, fixing where
> applicable in ip6_queue and nfnetlink_queue.
>
> 1) in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_queue.c
> - No need to perform data_len = 0 in the switch command, since data_len
> is initialized to 0 in the beginning of the
> ipq_build_packet_message() method
> - We can reach nlmsg_failure only from one place; skb is sure to be NULL
> when getting there; since skb is NULL, there is no need to check this fact
> and call kfree_skb().
>
> 2) in net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c:
> - No need to perform data_len = 0 in the switch command, since data_len
> is initialized to 0 in the beginning of the
> nfqnl_build_packet_message() method
>
> (Note: here, as opposed to previous patch, nlmsg_failure must check
> skb and free it if it is not NULL, so the call to kfree_skb() is
> needed , so it is not removed)
I've queued this patch and the previous one (without the procfs
bits) as one combined patch for 2.6.27, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists