[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080602111644.54738d57@appleyard>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:16:44 -0700
From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: power off unused ports
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:15:27 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > Here you can see that it would be very easy for another driver
> > to just add code to set the NO_HOTPLUG flag and then this code
> > will work for them as well, since we power off the phy using
> > DET which is specified by SATA.
>
> > here's that code:
>
> Agreed. The main discussion in this sub-thread is more about user
> interface. The user interface in this case, a module option, is
> specific to AHCI.
>
> Surely you can see how it is a bit silly to force each driver writer to
> create the same user interface in each driver, to support a generic concept.
>
> Jeff
>
>
Not all drivers will need a user interface to turn off hotplug
I would think. At any rate - I would think it'd be better to let
driver writers decide how they want their drivers to behave wrt
hotplug and power instead of forcing a generic policy on everyone.
This patch would provide users of AHCI controllers a way to save
power now, while you work on the grand scheme for polling/turning on off
hotplug via sysfs. It's an interim solution that impacts nobody but
ahci users and is can be easily integrated into whatever solution you
eventually work out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists