[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002c01c8c540$25c0cbb0$71426310$@css.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:07:48 +0900
From: "Takashi Nishiie" <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>
To: "'Mathieu Desnoyers'" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "'Hideo AOKI'" <haoki@...hat.com>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
"'Masami Hiramatsu'" <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Kernel marker has no performance impact on ia64.
Hello.
> One of my goal is to provide a mechanism that can feed both non-debug
> and debug information to a generic tracing mechanism to allow
> system-wide analysis of the kernel, both for production system and
> kernel debugging.
I agree with the target.
I understand there is a person who is the neat paranoiac that it
doesn't want to leave the code for debugging for a final code. If
it is a situation in which the code for debugging without united
interfaces lies scattered, the opinion might be correct.
It is an effective method only to set up the marker if the code
for debugging without united interfaces can be appropriately set
up with the marker.
I think that the mechanism that can offer both non-debugging and
debugging information to the generic pursuit mechanism to permit
the analysis of the entire kernel system in the meaning of
obtaining dynamic information for a long time not obtained by a
static necropsy by kdump is indispensable in a mission-critical
system.
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists