linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] x86 calgary: fix handling of devces that aren't behind the Calgary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:43:43 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	muli@...ibm.com
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alexisb@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] x86 calgary: fix handling of devces that aren't
	behind the Calgary

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 08:21:46 +0300
Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:31:33PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> 
> > The calgary code can give drivers addresses above 4GB which is very
> > bad for hardware that is only 32bit DMA addressable:
> > 
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/8/423
> > 
> > This patch tries to fix the problem by using per-device
> > dma_mapping_ops support. This fixes the calgary code to use swiotlb
> > or nommu properly for devices which are not behind the
> > Calgary/CalIOC2.
> > 
> > With this patch, the calgary code sets the global dma_ops to swiotlb
> > or nommu, and the dma_ops of devices behind the Calgary/CalIOC2 to
> > calgary_dma_ops. So the calgary code can handle devices safely that
> > aren't behind the Calgary/CalIOC2.
> 
> This seems a little backward to me. I thought we were going to get rid
> of the global dma_ops?

Yeah, I think that we can (though I'm not sure yet if it's the
cleanest way to handle IOMMUs). I think that it would better to clean
up the x86 IOMMU startup code a bit. Currently, IOMMUs interact too
much. It might take time for me to figure out the cleanest way so I
tried to fix the Calgary problem in the easiest way.

Yeah, I'm not sure if x86 maintainers are ok with the cleanup. If they
are, I'll try.


> If not, assuming going through the global one
> would be more efficient, Calgary should be the global one and
> nommu/swiotlb should be used on devices that do not have translation
> enabled. The reason why is that the majority of devices on a Calgary
> system, assuming Calgary is in use, will have translation enabled.

get_dma_ops() checks dev->archdata.dma_ops first then uses the global
if device dma_ops is NULL. So I'm not sure about the efficiency.

But I agreed that it's a bit odd to set nommu/swiotlb to the global
ops since the majority of devices uses calgary_ops on a Calgary
system, as you said. The patch does that just because seems that it's
the easiest way to handle devices that aren't behind Calgary.


> In general the patch looks good, barring the point above. We'll give
> it a spin on some Calgary/CalIOC2 machines.

Thanks,

Please feel free to drop the patch if you want to fix the problem
differently. I just wanted to see how the per-device ops can handle
the problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/