[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1K3ldP-0007pW-OA@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:34:07 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: raven@...maw.net
CC: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, jmoyer@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, miklos@...redi.hu, jesper@...gh.cc,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4
> Perhaps, if we didn't use /etc/mtab anywhere.
> It would make a difference if we could "mount" /proc/mounts onto a file
> such as /etc/mtab and everyone always did that.
That's actually remarkably close to being possible. Loopback mounts
have already been fixed not to rely on /etc/mtab. The only major
piece missing is "user" mounts, and there's already a patchset for
that waiting for review by the VFS maintainers. After that, it's just
a "simple" issue of fixing up all the userspace pieces. Could be
finished in the next decade, possibly ;)
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists