[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1212558119.3146.46.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:41:57 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, jmoyer@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jesper@...gh.cc,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 07:34 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Perhaps, if we didn't use /etc/mtab anywhere.
> > It would make a difference if we could "mount" /proc/mounts onto a file
> > such as /etc/mtab and everyone always did that.
>
> That's actually remarkably close to being possible. Loopback mounts
> have already been fixed not to rely on /etc/mtab. The only major
> piece missing is "user" mounts, and there's already a patchset for
> that waiting for review by the VFS maintainers. After that, it's just
> a "simple" issue of fixing up all the userspace pieces. Could be
> finished in the next decade, possibly ;)
;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists