[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806041252540.3235@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, avi@...ranet.com
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
pm-suspend/17334
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > Ahh yes - you are right , I've completely forget about that old post -
> > I've thought that my post are usually getting fixed sooner :)
> > So yes - this is actually the same bug which is still not fixed within
> > the latest kernel - the machine is running qemu guest (which seems to
> > me now somehow also slower)
>
> OK, so it looks like KVM could be wrongly enabling IRQs/preemption on the
> resume path. The original bug-report is on
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/130
sysdev_resume() is supposed to run with interrupts disabled, at least
it was that way when the timekeeping_resume code was written.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists