lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806041312070.10085@jikos.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:13:13 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc:	Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, avi@...ranet.com
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
 pm-suspend/17334

On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > OK, so it looks like KVM could be wrongly enabling IRQs/preemption on 
> > the resume path. The original bug-report is on 
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/130
> sysdev_resume() is supposed to run with interrupts disabled, at least
> it was that way when the timekeeping_resume code was written.

True. However in Zdenek's case, interrupts/preemption gets enabled 
somewhere during the resume, which correctly triggers the warning.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ