[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806041312070.10085@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:13:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, avi@...ranet.com
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
pm-suspend/17334
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > OK, so it looks like KVM could be wrongly enabling IRQs/preemption on
> > the resume path. The original bug-report is on
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/7/130
> sysdev_resume() is supposed to run with interrupts disabled, at least
> it was that way when the timekeeping_resume code was written.
True. However in Zdenek's case, interrupts/preemption gets enabled
somewhere during the resume, which correctly triggers the warning.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists