[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4846A75E.40305@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:31:58 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
dhazelton@...er.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] UML - Deal with host time going backwards
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:07:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> So if I change the host's time by an hour, the time will not advance at all
>> on the guest for the next hour? Sounds suboptimal :)
>>
>
> It is, but if the host is whacked, the guest just has to do the best that
> it can...
>
Shouldn't UML use a monotonic host clock for guest timekeeping?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists