lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4846A75E.40305@goop.org>
Date:	Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:31:58 +0100
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
	dhazelton@...er.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] UML - Deal with host time going backwards

Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:07:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>   
>> So if I change the host's time by an hour, the time will not advance at all
>> on the guest for the next hour? Sounds suboptimal :)
>>     
>
> It is, but if the host is whacked, the guest just has to do the best that
> it can...
>   

Shouldn't UML use a monotonic host clock for guest timekeeping?

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ