[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e108260806040738y4ad06f22tddd15df71a0a6bbb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:38:24 +0200
From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To: Lkm <lkm@...-linux.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Hardware clock instable
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Lkm <lkm@...-linux.com> wrote:
> Le Wednesday 04 June 2008 15:40:49 Bart Van AsscI de, vous avez écrit :
>> The reason I asked for the ntpd logs is that I'm still not sure
>> whether there is a hardware problem.
>
> In fact i'm wondering too .... But we have so many server with the same
> problem...
...
> 26 Feb 11:25:12 ntpd[2422]: time reset -0.492486 s
> I Don't know if we have rebooted the server this day..
A "time reset" can happen for one of three reasons:
* as a startup phenomenon (ntpd's frequency estimate is still converging).
* because of a step in the reference clock.
* because of instability of the hardware clock. Personally I have not
yet seen this.
>> And can you also post the
>> output of ntpq -pn ?
>>
> ntpq -pn
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
> ==============================================================================
> +192.168.0.150 195.220.194.193 3 u 531 1024 377 1.398 0.606 0.402
> *192.168.0.151 194.2.0.28 3 u 399 1024 377 0.554 0.426 0.172
This data looks normal -- both time servers have the same stratum,
reachability == 0377, delay and offset are below 5ms, and jitter is
below 1ms.
So I suggest that you observe the ntp logs for a few days and check
whether the ntp daemon logs any error messages.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists