lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:00:34 +0800 From: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com> To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pj@....com, menage@...gle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask() on 2008-6-4 8:55 Li Zefan wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:31:05 +0800 >> Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com> wrote: >> >>> extract two functions from update_cpumask() and update_nodemask().They will be >>> used later for updating tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE >>> offline/online. >> Unfortunately this patch conflicts with >> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cpusets-fix-bug-when-adding-nonexistent-cpu-or-mem.patch >> >> Please check that the patch which I merged still makes sense. ie: that >> we did not revert the effects of that bugfix. >> > > They are fixing 2 different bugs, so they are irrelated, but unfortunately conflict in > the code due to Miao's first patch which does code restructuring. > Right. I will modify my patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists