[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:08:08 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: set PAE PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT to match 64-bit
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:21:14 +0100
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
>
>> When a 64-bit x86 processor runs in 32-bit PAE mode, a pte can
>> potentially have the same number of physical address bits as the
>> 64-bit host ("Enhanced Legacy PAE Paging").
>>
>>
>
> the problem on 32 bit is that if you have that much ram, you run out of
> lowmem FAST.... so you have bigger problems.
>
Sure, you'd have to be barking mad to give a 32-bit system 2^40 bytes of
RAM. But under Xen the host's physical addresses are used in guest
pagetables, so you could have a reasonably sized 32-bit PAE Xen guest be
exposed to huge host physical addresses.
But the basic point is that, given that Enhanced Legacy PAE Paging
exists, 36-bits is not correct, so we should fix it. And if the
platform allows addressable hardware to be physically discontigious -
either memory or devices - then you may end up using large numbers of
physical bits without having a stupid amount of memory actually present.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists