[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:13:58 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>> > Subject: [PATCH] sched: don't call node_to_cpumask() on nodes >
>> > nr_node_ids
>>
>> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to
>> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the index
>> only got introduced by Mike's patch.
>
> the one below is needed as well i think.
Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even
that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists