[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080608172041.GA10383@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:20:41 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix TASK_WAKEKILL vs SIGKILL race
schedule() has the special "TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE && signal_pending()" case,
this allows us to do
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule();
without fear to sleep with pending signal.
However, the code like
current->state = TASK_KILLABLE;
schedule();
is not right, schedule() doesn't take TASK_WAKEKILL into account. This means
that mutex_lock_killable(), wait_for_completion_killable(), down_killable(),
schedule_timeout_killable() can miss SIGKILL (and btw the second SIGKILL has
no effect).
Introduce the new helper, signal_pending_state(), and change schedule() to
use it. Hopefully it will have more users, that is why the task's state is
passed separately.
Note this "__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED" check in signal_pending_state().
This is needed to preserve the current behaviour (ptrace_notify). I hope
this check will be removed soon, but this (afaics good) change needs the
separate discussion.
The fast path is "(state & (INTERRUPTIBLE | WAKEKILL)) + signal_pending(p)",
basically the same that schedule() does now. However, this patch of course
bloats schedule().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
include/linux/sched.h | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/sched.c | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- 26-rc2/include/linux/sched.h~1_SP_STATE 2008-06-01 16:44:39.000000000 +0400
+++ 26-rc2/include/linux/sched.h 2008-06-01 16:44:39.000000000 +0400
@@ -2027,6 +2027,19 @@ static inline int fatal_signal_pending(s
return signal_pending(p) && __fatal_signal_pending(p);
}
+static inline int signal_pending_state(long state, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (!(state & (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_WAKEKILL)))
+ return 0;
+ if (!signal_pending(p))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (state & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED))
+ return 0;
+
+ return (state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) || __fatal_signal_pending(p);
+}
+
static inline int need_resched(void)
{
return unlikely(test_tsk_need_resched(current));
--- 26-rc2/kernel/sched.c~1_SP_STATE 2008-06-08 16:15:25.000000000 +0400
+++ 26-rc2/kernel/sched.c 2008-06-08 16:52:23.000000000 +0400
@@ -4510,12 +4510,10 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
- if (unlikely((prev->state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) &&
- signal_pending(prev))) {
+ if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)))
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
- } else {
+ else
deactivate_task(rq, prev, 1);
- }
switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists