lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484D8CCC.1070701@embedromix.ro>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:04:28 +0300
From:	"Catalin(ux) M BOIE" <catab@...edromix.ro>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	pazke@...ke.donpac.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for a no-name 4 ports multiserial card

Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:14:00AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Fri,  6 Jun 2008 10:13:13 +0300
>> "Catalin(ux) M BOIE" <catab@...edromix.ro> wrote:
>>
>>> It is a no-name PCI card. I found no reference to a producer so I
>>> used the fake name "PDR".
>> We don't really want to get fake names into pci_ids. I'd rather
>>
>>
>>>  		.vendor		= PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX,
>>> +		.device		= PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9050,
>>> +		.subvendor	= PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX,
>>> +		.subdevice	= PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_PDR,
>> Either the hex or a local and obviously unknown name like ID_UNKNOWN_1
>>
>>
>>> +	pbn_plx_pdr,
>> _unknown1
>>
>>>  	pbn_oxsemi,
>>>  	pbn_intel_i960,
>>>  	pbn_sgi_ioc3,
>>> @@ -1186,6 +1196,13 @@ static struct pciserial_board pci_boards[] __devinitdata = {
>>>  		.base_baud	= 115200,
>>>  		.uart_offset	= 8,
>>>  	},
>>> +	/* PDR */
>>> +	[pbn_plx_pdr] = {
>> Ditto
>>
>>> +	/* PDR */
>> Ditto
>>
>>> +	{	PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9050,
>>> +		PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX,
>>> +		PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_PDR, 0, 0,
>> Ditto
>>
>>
>>> +#define PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_PDR		0x1584
>>> +
>> And not in here at all.
> 
> And there's no need for half the patch either - which I tried to explain
> in a previous reply to Catalin but I just got repeated "My email address
> has changed to ..." responses... so I gave up.

Rusell, I am very sorry about: sending e-mail without patch,
sending from an old mail address and calling you "Rusty".

The last version of the patch is attached. Please Ack it if it is OK
for you. If not, please let me know.

Andrew, please hold on a little bit to get the Ack from Russel.

Thank you all for your support and patience!

-- 
Catalin(ux) M BOIE
http://kernel.embedromix.ro/

View attachment "0001-Add-support-for-a-no-name-4-ports-multiserial-card.patch" of type "text/plain" (3115 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ