[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484D8F7E.4070104@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:15:58 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/41] cpu alloc / cpu ops v3: Optimize per cpu access
Andi Kleen a écrit :
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> writes:
>
>> The problem is that offsets relative to %gs or %fs are limited by the
>> small memory model that is chosen.
>
> Actually they are not. If you really want you can do
> movabs $64bit,%reg ; op ...,%gs:(%reg)
> It's just not very efficient compared to small (or rather kernel) model
> and also older binutils didn't support large model.
>
I am not sure Christoph was refering to actual instructions.
I was suggesting using for static percpu (vmlinux or modules) :
vmlinux : (offset31 computed by linker at vmlinux link edit time)
incl %gs:offset31
modules : (offset31 computed at module load time by module loader)
incl %gs:offset31
(If we make sure all this stuff is allocated in first chunk)
And for dynamic percpu :
movq field(%rdi),%rax
incl %gs:(%rax) /* full 64bits 'offsets' */
I understood (but might be wrong again) that %gs itself could not be used with an offset > 2GB, because
the way %gs segment is setup. So in the 'dynamic percpu' case, %rax should not exceed 2^31
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists