[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080608171235.5e1bba29.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:12:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 03/18] define BYTES_PER_WORD
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:44:55 -0500 Dean Nelson <dcn@....com> wrote:
> Add a BYTES_PER_WORD #define.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h 2008-05-30 13:59:29.580809165 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h 2008-05-30 14:00:00.200614111 -0500
> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
> #include <asm/sn/types.h>
> #include <asm/sn/bte.h>
>
> +/* >>> Add this #define to some linux header file some day. */
The patches fill the code with this ">>>" string - which can cause
false positives when people are searching for git rejects. Although I
(and I suspect most other people) search for "<<<<<<<".
> +#define BYTES_PER_WORD sizeof(void *)
Dunno if this is a desirable thing to have, really. A "word" is a
somewhat ill-defined thing. The definition you have here is always
equal to BYTES_PER_LONG. If BYTES_PER_LONG is inappropriate then
BYTES_PER_POINTER would be clearer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists