linux-kernel - [PATCH] at91_mci: manage cmd error and data error independently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <484E4901.3060705@atmel.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:27:29 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
CC:	ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>
Subject: [PATCH] at91_mci: manage cmd error and data error independently

In at91_mci_completed_command() function, this patch distinguishes 
command error and data error. It reports it in the corresponding 
error field.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
---
Related to this thread :

Pierre Ossman :

> On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:31:15 +0200
> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> Here are the results of a mmc_test run played on at91_mci after applying 
>> this patch series :
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/30/201
>>
>> I skipped some of the tests just to concentrate on those ones.
>>
>> Can you tell me if the test is correct : are the errors reported for the 
>> xfer_size tests the normal behavior (I assume yes because a failure is 
>> simulated) ?
>>     
>
> No. You're supposed to get an OK there as well. Basically it tests that
> the driver doesn't report some unexpected error (-ETIMEDOUT is the
> desired one) or overreports the number of written bytes.
>   
Ok, so here is the first correction of the driver reporting the proper 
values in read.

It goes on top of this series :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/30/201

 drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
index 9948fe1..86a3c5b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c
@@ -663,6 +664,7 @@ static void at91_mci_process_next(struct at91mci_host *host)
 static void at91_mci_completed_command(struct at91mci_host *host, unsigned int status)
 {
 	struct mmc_command *cmd = host->cmd;
+	struct mmc_data *data = cmd->data;
 
 	at91_mci_write(host, AT91_MCI_IDR, 0xffffffff & ~(AT91_MCI_SDIOIRQA | AT91_MCI_SDIOIRQB));
 
@@ -685,15 +687,25 @@ static void at91_mci_completed_command(struct at91mci_host *host, unsigned int s
 			cmd->error = 0;
 		}
 		else {
-			if (status & (AT91_MCI_RTOE | AT91_MCI_DTOE))
-				cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
-			else if (status & (AT91_MCI_RCRCE | AT91_MCI_DCRCE))
-				cmd->error = -EILSEQ;
-			else
-				cmd->error = -EIO;
+			if (status & (AT91_MCI_DTOE | AT91_MCI_DCRCE)) {
+				if (data) {
+					if (status & AT91_MCI_DTOE)
+						data->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
+					else if (status & AT91_MCI_DCRCE)
+						data->error = -EILSEQ;
+				}
+			} else {
+				if (status & AT91_MCI_RTOE)
+					cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
+				else if (status & AT91_MCI_RCRCE)
+					cmd->error = -EILSEQ;
+				else
+					cmd->error = -EIO;
+			}
 
-			pr_debug("Error detected and set to %d (cmd = %d, retries = %d)\n",
-				 cmd->error, cmd->opcode, cmd->retries);
+			pr_debug("Error detected and set to %d/%d (cmd = %d, retries = %d)\n",
+				cmd->error, data ? data->error : 0,
+				 cmd->opcode, cmd->retries);
 		}
 	}
 	else
-- 
1.5.3.7


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/