linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in pat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <484F0F5D.8010507@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:33:49 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
CC:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in pat_init()

Rene Herman wrote:
> 
> The current setup is okay really. The only thing it still wants is a 
> commandline whitelist switch but that needs a somewhat different setup 
> as validate_pat_support() is too early for __setup() or early_param().
> 

Actually, I think it's time to nuke the whitelist.  I don't think it has 
any CPUs on it that have the PAT flag enabled, still.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/