[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080611094730.GB5889@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:47:30 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in
pat_init()
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:33:49PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rene Herman wrote:
>> The current setup is okay really. The only thing it still wants is a
>> commandline whitelist switch but that needs a somewhat different setup as
>> validate_pat_support() is too early for __setup() or early_param().
>
> Actually, I think it's time to nuke the whitelist. I don't think it has
> any CPUs on it that have the PAT flag enabled, still.
For Intel all family 0xf CPUs, and family 6 CPUs starting with model
15 are whitelisted.
There seem to be other Intel CPUs that advertise PAT support.
See cpuinfo output at http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags
E.g. Pentium M (model 13), Celeron (model 6), Pentium III (model 8).
(Not sure how correct this information is, though)
Turn the white- into a blacklist for those remaining CPUs until they
are verified?
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists