[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080611162423.3ba183b4.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:24:23 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"yamamoto@...inux.co.jp" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] memcg: hardwall hierarhcy for memcg
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:03:29 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> ---
> Documentation/controllers/memory.txt | 27 +++++-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
> +++ temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
> @@ -237,12 +237,37 @@ cgroup might have some charge associated
> tasks have migrated away from it. Such charges are automatically dropped at
> rmdir() if there are no tasks.
>
> -5. TODO
> +5. Hierarchy Model
> + the kernel supports following kinds of hierarchy models.
The kernel supports the following kinds ....
> + (your middle-ware may support others based on this.)
(Your
> +
> + 5-a. Independent Hierarchy
> + There are no relationship between any cgroups, even among a parent and
is
> + children. This is the default mode. To use this hierarchy, write 0
> + to root cgroup's memory.hierarchy_model
> + echo 0 > .../memory.hierarchy_model.
> +
> + 5-b. Hardwall Hierarchy.
> + The resource has to be moved from the parent to the child before use it.
using it.
> + When a child's limit is set to 'val', val of the resource is moved from
> + the parent to the child. the parent's usage += val.
The parent's usage is incremented by val.
(if that's what you mean)
> + The amount of children's usage is reported by the file
> +
> + - memory.assigned_to_child
> +
> + This policy doesn't provide sophisticated automatic resource balancing in
> + the kernel. But this is very good for strict resource isolation. Users
kernel, but this ...
> + can get high predictability of behavior of applications if this is used
> + under proper environments.
> +
> +
> +6. TODO
>
> 1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller)
> 2. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first
> 3. Teach controller to account for shared-pages
> 4. Start reclamation when the limit is lowered
> + (this is already done in Hardwall Hierarchy)
> 5. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is
> not yet hit but the usage is getting closer
> --
---
~Randy
'"Daemon' is an old piece of jargon from the UNIX operating system,
where it referred to a piece of low-level utility software, a
fundamental part of the operating system."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists