[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240806120843s268b2ff4mb45a11adf11afc7f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:43:37 +0300
From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@...il.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: "Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
"Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
yi.zhu@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem: Out of memory after 2days with 2GB RAM
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:38 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:07:34 +0200
>> "Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > It looks like while there was a huge amount of buffers and caches -
>> > system was unable to allocate few pages for kmalloc in iwl3945 driver
>> > after resume.
>>
>> It looks like this is because it wants to allocate 2**5 contiguous
>> pages, which is 128kB of contiguous kernel memory.
>
> 64-bit system I assume?
> The allocation should be 256 * 20 * sizeof(struct sk_buff *).
> Try the patch below. It should improve code generation too.
>
> I discussed this with Tomas previously and he says the hw is capable of
> doing 20 fragments per frame (wonder why, Broadcom can do an unlimited
> number...) but he complained about the networking stack not being able
> to.
This is scatter gather buffers that can be kicked in one DMA transaction.
Well, the hardware needs to support IP checksumming for that, hence,
> afaik, only two fragments can ever be used (one for hw header, one for
> frame)
This I still don't understand why but everybody is already tired to
explaining me why.. :) Just need to find time to dig into it.
> This cuts the allocation to 10%, or (under) a page in all cases.
Probably. it would be safe to use vmalloc for allocating txb anyway.
I'll give it a try.
There was already discussion on LKML about memory allocation problems
on X86_64, which might explain this regression. This didn't happen
before.
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists