| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <485198E5.80109@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:45:09 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> CC: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] final PCI patches for 2.6.26 Jesse Barnes wrote: > Some of these may not have seen review on linux-pci, so I'm sending them out > for comment before I send Linus the pull request. > > Any comments/objections? > > The biggest patch by far is the resource_wc stuff; it should have been pushed > earlier, but for some reason I thought Ingo & co. were going to do that... > > Thanks, > Jesse > > commit a123c3d9643464c56417680536ed9515f15cffa1 > Author: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> > Date: Mon May 12 21:21:05 2008 +0200 Although I quite appreciate the addition of patches, IMO it would be easier to read if the patch descriptions and patches were not mixed together. Most 'git pull' things I've seen include a changeset summary (shortlog) and cumulative patch, when its a single email. Sometimes (i.e. GregKH and a few others) the individual patches are posted in separate emails. Either way, it saves one from having to wade through a long email, just to get an idea of the sum total of the changes... Regards, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists