[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806121519.24194.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:19:24 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] final PCI patches for 2.6.26
On Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:45 pm Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Some of these may not have seen review on linux-pci, so I'm sending them
> > out for comment before I send Linus the pull request.
> >
> > Any comments/objections?
> >
> > The biggest patch by far is the resource_wc stuff; it should have been
> > pushed earlier, but for some reason I thought Ingo & co. were going to do
> > that...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jesse
> >
> > commit a123c3d9643464c56417680536ed9515f15cffa1
> > Author: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
> > Date: Mon May 12 21:21:05 2008 +0200
>
> Although I quite appreciate the addition of patches, IMO it would be
> easier to read if the patch descriptions and patches were not mixed
> together.
>
> Most 'git pull' things I've seen include a changeset summary (shortlog)
> and cumulative patch, when its a single email. Sometimes (i.e. GregKH
> and a few others) the individual patches are posted in separate emails.
Right, I probably should have used one of the git mail scripts... but this
wasn't a real git pull request either, more of a "hey please sanity check
this" type thing. I figured in this case keeping the changelogs was
important, but didn't want to spam people with a bunch of messages when the
total size really wasn't that big...
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists