linux-kernel - Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4851AA24.7060906@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:58:44 +0400
From:	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
To:	webmaster@...gonslave.de
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC

Hi Daniel,

Could you please provide full dmesg and acpidump outputs?

Thanks,
Alex.

Daniel Exner wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>   
>> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:30:28 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@...gonslave.de> wrote:
>>     
>>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>       
>>>> (cc linux-acpi)
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:12 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@...gonslave.de> 
>>>>         
> wrote:
>   
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> (Added myself to CC, because I'm not subscribed)
>>>>>
>>>>> with linux-next snapshot 20080604 my Laptop morphes into sitting duck
>>>>> and I think this is due to this:
>>>>>           
>>>> I assume 2.6.26-rc5 is OK?
>>>>         
>>> Indeed.. just tried it with (nearly) the same config: no unable to locate
>>> IOAPIC
>>>
>>> Will try todays next snapshot above -rc5 now.
>>>       
>> OK, thanks.
>>
>> It would be great if you could test 2.6.26-rc5 plus
>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-acpi.patch.  That'll allow us to
>> confirm that the regression is due to changes in the acpi tree.
>>     
> Sorry for the delay.. real-life you know ;)
>
> I guess you'd expect me to confirm the behavior on rc5 with this patch aplied, 
> but .. well this Kernel works!
>
> So I think the regression is NOT in the acpi tree. Perhaps pci subsystem?
> If I find time I'll try bisecting it..
>
> Greetings
> Daniel Exner
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/