linux-kernel - Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200806131307.39807.dex@dragonslave.de>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:07:39 +0200
From:	Daniel Exner <dex@...gonslave.de>
To:	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC

Hi all,

Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Could you please provide full dmesg and acpidump outputs?
I attached dmesg and config , both from working 2.6.26-rc5 with git-acpi patch 
below and from linux-next snapshot 20080604.
I also attached acpidump that was done while using stock 2.6.25-fw5 from my 
distro. (But I think that doesnt matter, at least it shouldn't ;)

> Daniel Exner wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:30:28 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@...gonslave.de> 
wrote:
> >>> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>> (cc linux-acpi)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:12 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@...gonslave.de>
> >
> > wrote:
> >>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (Added myself to CC, because I'm not subscribed)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> with linux-next snapshot 20080604 my Laptop morphes into sitting duck
> >>>>> and I think this is due to this:
> >>>>
> >>>> I assume 2.6.26-rc5 is OK?
> >>>
> >>> Indeed.. just tried it with (nearly) the same config: no unable to
> >>> locate IOAPIC
> >>>
> >>> Will try todays next snapshot above -rc5 now.
> >>
> >> OK, thanks.
> >>
> >> It would be great if you could test 2.6.26-rc5 plus
> >> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-acpi.patch.  That'll allow us to
> >> confirm that the regression is due to changes in the acpi tree.
> >
> > Sorry for the delay.. real-life you know ;)
> >
> > I guess you'd expect me to confirm the behavior on rc5 with this patch
> > aplied, but .. well this Kernel works!
To clarify myself:
2.6.25.5:  --> relatively fast no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5:   --> relatively  no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5 + git-acpi Patch:   --> relatively  no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5 +  linux-next snapshot 20080604 --> even slower than before my ide 
Patch many "unable to locate IOAPIC" Errors


So I think the problem lies not in the acpi tree but somewhre else.

Is it possible to tell git to explicitly _exclude_ a specific tree while 
bisecting?

--
Greetings
Daniel Exner

View attachment "config_2.6.26-rc5_acpiTree" of type "text/plain" (87917 bytes)

View attachment "acpidump" of type "text/plain" (79467 bytes)

View attachment "config_2.6.26-rc5_next" of type "text/plain" (89601 bytes)

View attachment "dmesg.rc5.acpi" of type "text/plain" (30554 bytes)

View attachment "dmesg.next" of type "text/plain" (29686 bytes)