[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4852654D.9060306@bull.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:17:17 +0200
From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sysfs tagged directories V5
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Benjamin Thery (benjamin.thery@...l.net):
>>> Greg,
>>>
>>> Here is an updated version of the sysfs tagged directories that improves
>>> a bit the situation over the previous one.
>>>
[...]
>>>
>>> The generic part can be merge with patch 05 ("sysfs: Implement sysfs
>>> tagged directory support.") but I left it separate for now to ease
>>> reviews.
>> Thanks. Not nearly as radical as I'd feared.
>>
>> Greg, does this address your concern? It stops the need to put any
>> non-braindead code (i.e. the _exit notifier stuff) in fs/sysfs/mount.c for
>> any new namespaces needing sysfs tagging, leaving only simple
>> comparison/assignments.
>
> Sorry, I've been swamped with other things this week and haven't gotten
> a chance to look this over. Hopefully by the end of the week... It's
> in my queue though, don't worry it will not get lost.
Greg,
I've ported the patchset to 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 yesterday and I have just
finished testing it. Will this help you if I send you an up-to-date
tarball with this new version? or is it fine for you to review the
patchset I sent last week (based on 2.6.26-rc2-mm1)?
Tell me what you prefer.
Benjamin
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>
--
B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D
http://www.bull.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists