[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080613122751.GF7212@baikonur.stro.at>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:27:51 +0200
From: maximilian attems <max@...o.at>
To: "Klaus S. Madsen" <ubuntu@...rnemadsen.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chuck Short <zulcss@...ntu.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hdaps add support for various IBM thinkpads R61/T61/T61P
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:40:02PM +0200, Klaus S. Madsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 13:26:47 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c b/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c
> > index 26df06f..e07c712 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c
> > @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata hdaps_whitelist[] = {
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R50"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R51"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R52"),
> > + HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R61"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("LENOVO", "ThinkPad R61i"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("IBM", "ThinkPad T41p"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T41"),
> > @@ -523,6 +524,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata hdaps_whitelist[] = {
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T43"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("LENOVO", "ThinkPad T60"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("LENOVO", "ThinkPad T61"),
> > + HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T61"),
> > + HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T61P"),
> I would suspect that this part of the patch is unnecessary. It would be
> strange if there are any T61's where the manufacturer is IBM, instead of
> LENOVO, since the T60 is older and has the manufacturer listed as
> LENOVO, and no entry exists for IBM.
>
> But according to the comment at the top of the struct, the second line
> (the T61P part) is unnecessary, as a T61p already would be matched by
> the T61 line.
according to hardy git there is no bug reference, but the T61p got added
before the T61 both by chuck. could you enlighten us please on the T61
IBM match need?
thanks
--
maks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists