[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806161028080.2949@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction
abstraction
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> ptep_modify_prot_start() returns the current pte value, and puts the
> pte entry into a state where either the hardware will not update the
> pte, or if it does, the updates will be preserved on commit.
>
> ptep_modify_prot_commit() writes back the updated pte, makes sure that
> any hardware updates made since ptep_modify_prot_start() are
> preserved.
Ok, I'm fine with this now that it's renamed to be clearly about just
protection bits.
So
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
for what it's worth.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists