[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806161906490.19564@blonde.site>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:13:48 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.or>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> > ptep_modify_prot_start() returns the current pte value, and puts the
> > pte entry into a state where either the hardware will not update the
> > pte, or if it does, the updates will be preserved on commit.
> >
> > ptep_modify_prot_commit() writes back the updated pte, makes sure that
> > any hardware updates made since ptep_modify_prot_start() are
> > preserved.
>
> Ok, I'm fine with this now that it's renamed to be clearly about just
> protection bits.
>
> So
>
> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
And seems very reasonable (and exceptionally well described) to me too.
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists