[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080617173021.C1FE.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:34:09 +0900
From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix new alloc_bootmem_core (Re: [PATCH -mm 08/14] bootmem: clean up alloc_bootmem_core)
Hi Johannes-san.
I found a bug in this patch.
> - eidx = end_pfn - PFN_DOWN(node_boot_start);
> + if (goal && goal < max)
> + start = ALIGN(goal, step);
> + else
> + start = ALIGN(min, step);
Here should check (min < goal) too.
If not, start can becomes smaller than min. and sidx doesn't point
correct index.
alloc_bootmem_node() almost allocates pages of other node,
when node's min address is over MAX_DMA_ADDRESS.
Bye.
----
Fix new alloc_bootmem_core() of bootmem-clean-up-alloc_bootmem_core.patch
in 2.6.26-rc5-mm3.
(min < goal) should be checked too.
Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
---
mm/bootmem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: current/mm/bootmem.c
===================================================================
--- current.orig/mm/bootmem.c 2008-06-17 18:33:31.000000000 +0900
+++ current/mm/bootmem.c 2008-06-17 18:34:27.000000000 +0900
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@
step = max(align >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1UL);
- if (goal && goal < max)
+ if (goal && min < goal && goal < max)
start = ALIGN(goal, step);
else
start = ALIGN(min, step);
--
Yasunori Goto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists