[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0806171133220.6620@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:35:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Maxim Shchetynin <maxim@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AZFS file system proposal
On Tuesday 2008-06-17 11:06, Maxim Shchetynin wrote:
>
>> (a) What is axonram?
>> (b) why is axonram direct_access, and my other devices (including
>> standard PC RAM) not?
>
>[Axonram is a module specific for IBM CellBlade and allows access to
>a DDR2 memory attached onto Axon controller.] You don't need
>direct_access and not azfs for main memory because there is already
>a pretty nice tmpfs for it.
So the reason azfs could be useful is...?
>> >+ Mounting such device with azfs gives memory mapped
>> >access to the + underlying memory to user space.
>>
>> Can't I just mmap(/dev/theblockdevice), why would I need to go through
>> azfs?
>
>Yes, you can mmap it. But what does it have to do with a file system.
Exactly, that's what I was asking myself.
>I would say you can either mmap it or place a file system on it.
The help text implies that I *need* azfs to mmap it - and that sounds
like a Rube Goldberg machine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists