[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080619101030.GF15228@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:10:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Increase MAX_APICS for very large x86_64 configs
* Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote:
> Increase the maximum number of apics when running very large
> configurations. This patch has no affect on most systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
applied to tip/x86/uv - thanks Jack.
> The patch has no effect on any 32-bit kernel. It adds ~4k to the size
> of 64-bit kernels but only if NR_CPUS > 255.
>
> This is a repost of an earlier patch (4/16) that was implicated in a
> random-qa failure. I have not been able to reproduce the failure using
> the same boot args & config. Best guess is that some other patch
> caused random data corruption & this patch was a victim.
i have just re-tested the previously failing config on tip/master:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Thu_Apr_17_10_17_14_CEST_2008.bad
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
and the good news is that it does not crash on bootup anymore. Perhaps
one of Mike's fixes/improvements did the trick?
Nevertheless i'll keep an eye on this change and wont propagate it to
linux-next for a few days to make sure it's all robust on a wide range
of x86 testsystems.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists