lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080620132110.GB19740@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:21:10 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
	Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG][PATCH -mm] avoid BUG() in __stop_machine_run()


* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:

>> This simply introduces a flag to allow us to disable the capability 
>> checks for internal callers (this is simpler than splitting the 
>> sched_setscheduler() function, since it loops checking permissions).
>>   
> What about?
>
> int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
> 		       struct sched_param *param)
> {
> 	return __sched_setscheduler(p, policy, param, true);
> }
>
>
> int sched_setscheduler_nocheck(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
> 		               struct sched_param *param)
> {
> 	return __sched_setscheduler(p, policy, param, false);
> }
>
>
> (With the appropriate transformation of sched_setscheduler -> __)
>
> Better than scattering stray true/falses around the code.

agreed - it would also be less intrusive on the API change side.

i've created a new tip/sched/new-API-sched_setscheduler topic for this 
to track it, but it would be nice to have a v2 of this patch that 
introduces the new API the way suggested by Jeremy. (Hence the new topic 
is auto-merged into tip/master but not into linux-next yet.) Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ