[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485B2180.10507@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:18:24 -0500
From: Jon Tollefson <kniht@...ibm.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
CC: Jon Tollefson <kniht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>,
Adam Litke <agl@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc5-mm3: BUG large value for HugePages_Rsvd
Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:27:47AM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote:
>
>> After running some of the libhugetlbfs tests the value for
>> /proc/meminfo/HugePages_Rsvd becomes really large. It looks like it has
>> wrapped backwards from zero.
>> Below is the sequence I used to run one of the tests that causes this;
>> the tests passes for what it is intended to test but leaves a large
>> value for reserved pages and that seemed strange to me.
>> test run on ppc64 with 16M huge pages
>>
>
> Yes Adam reported that here yesterday, he found it in his hugetlfs testing.
> I have done some investigation on it and it is being triggered by a bug in
> the private reservation tracking patches. It is triggered by the hugetlb
> test which causes some complex vma splits to occur on a private mapping.
>
sorry I missed that
> I believe I have the underlying problem nailed and do have some nearly
> complete patches for this and they should be in a postable state by
> tommorrow.
>
Cool.
> -apw
>
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists